Left Blog

Today’s left ideology made here.

Conservatives: Equality would remove life’s goals


There’s this big contradiction: Our nation’s founding axioms set up certain equalities, justice for all, and democratic process. That is our grand political container.  

But you may get none of those if you spend your waking hours working in an American corporation, which are often petty tyrannies. Maltreatment at work is common: bullying, threats, no due process, and nobody wants your democratic opinion. The justification for these dark work pits is that at least you are free to quit.

Shabby conditions in this, the most advanced nation.

Do you think that’s an exaggeration? Well, Studs Terkel interviewed a hundred Americans on the job, then began his report Working by writing, “This book, being about work, is by its very nature, about violence – to the spirit as well as to the body” (1), and Ehrenreich more recently has described the toxic pressures on workers which are used to produce profit in American work places (2).

Social inequality is the root. Maltreatment and coercive misery are unlikely if we are all equal. Would anybody prefer inequality?


The paradoxical answer is, yes. When Robert Lane (3) interviewed 15 conservative American men, asking them how they would react to real social equality, he got a faceful. Some of the men said equality would be chaotic, the world would collapse.  All 15 said equality would deprived them of their goals and incentives in life. Apparently they were saying, what’s the point to life if you can’t rise? – And to rise, there must be inequality.

Next it’s obvious that inequality is divisive.  It separates person from person. It breaks social bonds. 


Actually, for a nation that mostly denies it has social clases,  this country is fascinated with differences and rank.   – And good deal of fear mixed in. It is part of the conservative fascination with strength over goodness.

 Rawls (3) shows how this gets rationalized out: in the capitalist’s view, inequality is useful – it keeps different jobs in our economy staffed.  Another rationalization: if  the pain doesn’t actually kill you it will make you stronger.  A third rationalization is that we are all driven by ‘laws of nature.’

And this is the  Darwinian theme which propels business.  Working America advances on divisive practices.


So for conservatives to make life worth living you need somebody to look down on. That struggle, played out day after day, means real life consequences. It spawns distrust, stress, which breeds suspiciousness. Check out conditions in some of our sales and marketing corporations. There’s a gladiator mentality. That person working next to you, hard-eyed and debt-indentured, wants your place. The crushed’s prime motivation in life is to join the crushers. And if you extend that to a whole nation?  Pervasive distrust and a carnal desire to win has painted this nation in deep shadow.


It is jailhouse mentality. There can be no natural unity, if we follow that.

Some people seek safety, and there is always a life working for somebody else, but rather than leading to the proud American dream, it mainly leads to the submissive injustice of nothing but debt.


Having unity, and insisting on someone to rise above, is a contradiction in spirit.

So it is not equality that threatens this nation, as conservatives believe. Indeed, the reverse.  This business of everybody against everybody is dropping this nation into chaos. 

And these contradictions, and the rationalizations which support them, do not advance the nation. They bind and hobble us. An economy based on Darwin’s laws leave us no time for manufacture and productiveness. No fraternité . Indeed, they are leaving many Americans hungry. 


And this is a challenge to any social philosopher, or economist. No matter how spine-stirring, something cannot be a law of nature if it destroys community. First principles endure: you cannot build, nor keep, a civil society based on competition, distrust, and fear of your neighbor’s intentions. 

What can be done?

What’s the alternative?

The pursuit of justice first. More equality.  Equality is the glue of friendship and bonding and trust.

But will this break a law of nature? No, because our first natural impulses are toward mutual support. Everyone begins that way, in every family. That is nature.

Mutual support, not a war of all against all.

So it is a founding axiom of this country, that all men are created equal. Justice first. Justice is what guides the sun in its path over this nation, not inequality. It is this vision of social justice that fires our community workers, civil rights workers, unionizers and anti-poverty workers.


Recognized, it is a difficult task to create amity and equity out of the conservative mind. Trying to salvage trust from a gladiator mentality. But this is the liberal mission: to put those detructive values in reverse. We in this vastly unequal society have everything to gain from equality of conditions.

We are pursuing human happiness, we are not animals.  Rather than divide against each other, if we work together we will make a stronger nation.

These are liberal values: Resurrect justice. Tear down the paradoxes that make life worth living only at the expense of others. Tear down this toxic institution of man-against-man. 

Mend our national spirit.


Notes. 1. Terkel, S. (1972) Working NY: New Press  2. Ehrenreich, B. (2005) Bait and switch NY: Metropolitan Books  3. Lane, R. (2004) The fear of equality, in Political psychology Eds. J. Jost, N. Sidanius. NY: Psychology Press, p. 217. 








  1. Wait, how are you going to achieve, let alone maintain equality between people who are for all intents and purposes unequal?! I understand corporatism is evil due to its global scale however the key is less government. Without big government the globalist corporations would wither on the vine, and localism could flourish.

    Strength over goodness? Not even close! Good and evil are human constructs so this goodness you speak of is only relevant in a religious context and since you surrendered religion to the altar of “tolerance” this is not a viable argument for you. Inequality is not a freedom? Freedom is a buzz word, it means something different to everyone. The closest you come to freedom is when you can do what you want! The more government and laws you have, the less freedom.

    Comment by WN | June 6, 2009 | Reply

  2. A few more half-truths from the left–defenitons and terms that insulate themselves because they cannot survive on their own merits–

    —progressive who the hell is against new ideas and technologies?!

    –secular even a Jesus nut like Bush would concede that a state religion is not a good idea and could therefore be considered “secular”

    humanist– This one takes the cake. As a libertarian I checked out both of the “major party” candidates and actually watched the first debate just to make sure that neither of them scared me into voting for the other, and neither of them did. Remember (if you actually paid attention) that Obama was the only Democrat to specifically endorse capitalism and McCain was the only Republican to endorse (ok, Im with you on this one) evolution. It could have been a lot worse. Like you would have wanted it to be. A “humanist” believes in human rights and our right and responsibility to enhance our own lives. That describes EVERYONE who isnt a new-earth Creationist. This is just another example of the left throwing out terms that make people feel good because they know their arguments cannot stand on their own.

    Take your Leninist nightmare elsewhere

    Comment by Kevin | June 17, 2009 | Reply

  3. Excellent site, keep up the good work. I read a lot of blogs on a daily basis and for the most part, people lack substance but, I just wanted to make a quick comment to say I’m glad I found your blog. Thanks,

    A definite great read. :)

    Comment by Bill Bartmann | September 19, 2009 | Reply

  4. I’m glad I found your blog. Thanks, :)

    Comment by Tony Brown | September 24, 2009 | Reply

  5. There is obviously a lot to know about this. There are some good points here.

    Comment by GeneTinsley | October 9, 2009 | Reply

  6. Love browsing this page, always find out something interesting stuff.
    Emily R.

    Comment by huskylover | March 5, 2010 | Reply

  7. Someone in my Facebook group shared this site with us. I’m definitely loving the information. I’m bookmarking and will be tweeting this to my followers! Terrific blog and great design.

    Comment by Anonymous | October 17, 2014 | Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: