So you think the best antipoverty program is a strong economy?
Still listening to that ‘rising tide lifts all boats‘?
After all we’re going through. After the reports, the statistics, the debates. Next time you hear somebody talk that ‘rising tide lifts all boats,’ just do a U-turn. Flip the channel.
It’s a wrenchingly insulting metaphor from a group of nasty people.
After the catastrophic events of the past years, they continue to natter the little sayism. ‘A rising tide lifts all boats.’
But this image never fits what you see, looking out the window, as you drive through the city.
It is a competitive society. They are proud of that. Now, the outcome of any competition is inevitably a winner and a loser. That’s an inequality. Obviously both people are not lifted; only the winner’s boat.
So they musts concede that in a competition (between people or between groups) one side increases, the other side decreases. The sum of the two is zero. That’s why it’s called a “zero-sum”.
So the truth we need to be telling each other is another picture. Scrap the boats. The accurate picture is: The higher the tree, the deeper the roots.
The economy is an organic whole. The top and bottom parts are not disconnected from each other. Not detached like boats, and that aspect is obvious. Everything is connected in society. The tree’s branches reach high into the glittering sun because the roots reach low into the clotted dark.
So in the business world. Stratospheric bonuses for CEOs are possible because the wages of the workers have not increased from mud-low.
So why do they keep drawing for us this picture ‘a rising tide lifts all boats’ on us?
Because generations of greed are so rationalized.
But why do they say so, when it is clear it is not so? Over and over, like preachers who shout from the pulpit for two thousand years that the rapture is coming, and for two thousand years the congregation then turns out of the church door in rapture. But on the way home, the congregation doesn’t see any rapture. Just the city. On the way home, they notice that every year, the limousines get longer and every year there are more homeless people.
We think: it can’t be. Some people are raised, yes. But not the poor. Not all are raised.
Educators: this is a teachable moment. That boats metaphor is insulting because it’s not rational. In any competition (on which business is based) one party wins because the other party loses. It is not possible that both the winner and the loser of a competition win.
The depth of this is that, after this is explained, that they will use their sayism again. But repetition is not the same as truth.
If we try to explain to them about the tree roots, they start to object, not on the basis of evidence, but with scorn that we do not understand.
That scorn is no substitute for reality. It is the way they nail their points. And it does not make the boats image true.
Politicians know the effectiveness of images and metaphor to convey complex processes because it’s hard to disprove an image. And in our culture of sound bytes, the shorter the communication, the better — few people stop to ingest an economic treatises. But a competing image, catching the imagination, has the power to move, because it combines concept and feeling. It has a sticking quality. Communicated, it has the power to upset a whole paradigm.
Less boat. More tree.
I have pointed this fallacy in logic to many of my conservative friends: The tide rises from the bottom up, not the top down.
Trickle-down is only works (is only supposed to!) in an actual liberal free-market society, complete with transparency of information, engaged voters, aggressive press, contract enforcement, antitrust enforcement, consequences for failure, etc. Reality is, the left and the right both support pretty much all of these concepts, with a few minor differences in implementation between them. It’s the politically/financially elite Democrats and Republicans that are perverting the system and making sure that this doesn’t happen.
Garbage. Lower taxes make for more jobs.
Real-world example: Like many people, my wife and I make more than we require to live. Not a huge amount, but enough to save and invest. If you raise my taxes, do you think I am going to move to a smaller house, or eat less often, or buy cheaper things for my family? No, I’m going to invest less.
Less investment = less jobs. It’s so simple that you’d have to be an idiot or an intellectual to miss it.
What nobody says is that, when the tide rises on one side of the ocean, it is going out on the other side of the ocean. As the tide rises for rich folks on the one shore, it is going down for the poor folks on the other side.
They really need to pick a better metaphor to deceive people.
Whatever govts do, they do it less-efficiently than individuals can do. A bureaucrat thinks “well it is OPM (other peoples’s money), so what can I lose?”