<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Conservatives: equality would remove life&#8217;s goals</title>
	<atom:link href="http://leftsolutions.wordpress.com/conservatives-equality-would-remove-lifes-goals/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://leftsolutions.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>Today's left ideology made here.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 09:05:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: GeneTinsley</title>
		<link>http://leftsolutions.wordpress.com/conservatives-equality-would-remove-lifes-goals/#comment-1792</link>
		<dc:creator>GeneTinsley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 21:03:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leftsolutions.wordpress.com/?page_id=3862#comment-1792</guid>
		<description>There is obviously a lot to know about this.  There are some good points here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is obviously a lot to know about this.  There are some good points here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony Brown</title>
		<link>http://leftsolutions.wordpress.com/conservatives-equality-would-remove-lifes-goals/#comment-1780</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 10:23:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leftsolutions.wordpress.com/?page_id=3862#comment-1780</guid>
		<description> I&#039;m glad I found your blog.  Thanks, :)
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m glad I found your blog.  Thanks, :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Bartmann</title>
		<link>http://leftsolutions.wordpress.com/conservatives-equality-would-remove-lifes-goals/#comment-1768</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Bartmann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 14:28:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leftsolutions.wordpress.com/?page_id=3862#comment-1768</guid>
		<description>Excellent site, keep up the good work.  I read a lot of blogs on a daily basis and for the most part, people lack substance but, I just wanted to make a quick comment to say I&#039;m glad I found your blog.  Thanks, 

A definite great read. :)    

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent site, keep up the good work.  I read a lot of blogs on a daily basis and for the most part, people lack substance but, I just wanted to make a quick comment to say I&#8217;m glad I found your blog.  Thanks, </p>
<p>A definite great read. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://leftsolutions.wordpress.com/conservatives-equality-would-remove-lifes-goals/#comment-1139</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 02:01:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leftsolutions.wordpress.com/?page_id=3862#comment-1139</guid>
		<description>A few more half-truths from the left--defenitons and terms that insulate themselves because they cannot survive on their own merits--

---progressive   who the hell is against new ideas and technologies?!

--secular        even a Jesus nut like Bush would concede that a state religion is not a good idea and could therefore be considered &quot;secular&quot;

humanist--  This one takes the cake. As a libertarian I checked out both of the &quot;major party&quot; candidates and actually watched the first debate just to make sure that neither of them scared me into voting for the other, and neither of them did. Remember (if you actually paid attention) that Obama was the only Democrat to specifically endorse capitalism and McCain was the only Republican to endorse (ok, Im with you on this one) evolution. It could have been a lot worse. Like you would have wanted it to be. A &quot;humanist&quot; believes in human rights and our right and responsibility to enhance our own lives. That describes EVERYONE who isnt a new-earth Creationist. This is just another example of the left throwing out terms that make people feel good because they know their arguments cannot stand on their own.

Take your Leninist nightmare elsewhere</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A few more half-truths from the left&#8211;defenitons and terms that insulate themselves because they cannot survive on their own merits&#8211;</p>
<p>&#8212;progressive   who the hell is against new ideas and technologies?!</p>
<p>&#8211;secular        even a Jesus nut like Bush would concede that a state religion is not a good idea and could therefore be considered &#8220;secular&#8221;</p>
<p>humanist&#8211;  This one takes the cake. As a libertarian I checked out both of the &#8220;major party&#8221; candidates and actually watched the first debate just to make sure that neither of them scared me into voting for the other, and neither of them did. Remember (if you actually paid attention) that Obama was the only Democrat to specifically endorse capitalism and McCain was the only Republican to endorse (ok, Im with you on this one) evolution. It could have been a lot worse. Like you would have wanted it to be. A &#8220;humanist&#8221; believes in human rights and our right and responsibility to enhance our own lives. That describes EVERYONE who isnt a new-earth Creationist. This is just another example of the left throwing out terms that make people feel good because they know their arguments cannot stand on their own.</p>
<p>Take your Leninist nightmare elsewhere</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WN</title>
		<link>http://leftsolutions.wordpress.com/conservatives-equality-would-remove-lifes-goals/#comment-1099</link>
		<dc:creator>WN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 06:33:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leftsolutions.wordpress.com/?page_id=3862#comment-1099</guid>
		<description>Wait, how are you going to achieve, let alone maintain equality between people who are for all intents and purposes unequal?! I understand corporatism is evil due to its global scale however the key is less government. Without big government the globalist corporations would wither on the vine, and localism could flourish.

 Strength over goodness? Not even close! Good and evil are human constructs so this goodness you speak of is only relevant in a religious context and since you surrendered religion to the altar of &quot;tolerance&quot; this is not a viable argument for you. Inequality is not a freedom? Freedom is a buzz word, it means something different to everyone. The closest you come to freedom is when you can do what you want! The more government and laws you have, the less freedom.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wait, how are you going to achieve, let alone maintain equality between people who are for all intents and purposes unequal?! I understand corporatism is evil due to its global scale however the key is less government. Without big government the globalist corporations would wither on the vine, and localism could flourish.</p>
<p> Strength over goodness? Not even close! Good and evil are human constructs so this goodness you speak of is only relevant in a religious context and since you surrendered religion to the altar of &#8220;tolerance&#8221; this is not a viable argument for you. Inequality is not a freedom? Freedom is a buzz word, it means something different to everyone. The closest you come to freedom is when you can do what you want! The more government and laws you have, the less freedom.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
